When there are no definite goals or wants or any purpose, thoughts are random, drifting and fleeting. They are never a problem or burden.
But when there is a motive or goal, thoughts gather momentum, begin to solidify, bolstering the notion of the 'thinker' or 'achiever'.
"Wanting and thinking, always go together." - UG
If there are no spiritual or material goals, UG says that 'thought becomes disconnected and disjointed.'
Any goal or purpose keeps us preoccupied, hijacking our senses.
"The only difference between you and me is that you are preoccupied, and I am not." - UG
****
UG: The notion of your natural state, not my natural state, I am describing the natural state of the individual when this constant interference of the manipulative thought, is not there.
That is what I am describing, not my state. I don't know a
damn thing about my state. So, you are relating that to the way you are
functioning.
Q: And find wanting, find that wanting…
UG: So, relating it to the way you are functioning, and you do
that because you want to change that into this state that I am describing, the
change.
Q: That is the...That movement is not there.
UG: There is no change necessary, what I am saying. There is
nothing to be changed there. The demand to change into something.
Q: Which is there in me, is not there.
UG: There is nothing to be changed
here. You think there is something to be changed.
Q: I think so.
UG: Because you see the description of your natural state has
created a division there and it says you see that not the way I am functioning,
right?
Yes, all right.
But why do you want to function that way? The other one.
Q: Because you are not satisfied with the state in which you
are in.
Exactly.
Because of that, sorry?
Q: The manipulative thought creates the division.
UG: The thought creates the division, but the thought in its
very nature is short-lived.
Q:But you are saying that painful thought is not the true
state.
UG: What is that?
Q: The changes in thought, frequent changes in thought, show
that they have no basis.
UG: No, you see, the use of
thought to achieve something is the problem.
Whether it is material achievement or spiritual achievement.
You call it a spiritual achievement, but the instrument which
you are using is matter.
So, the so-called desire to achieve a spiritual goal is also
materialistic.
So, both of them are finished.
Q: Thought should cease.
UG: Thought will not cease. Thought is not the instrument.
Q: What is the instrument?
UG: There is no instrument at all.
The achievement you are interested in is made possible, but
not guaranteed, through this instrument called thinking.
Q: What exactly is the material?
UG: Thought is the material.
The idea that there is something to be achieved, the goal is
fixed.
So, what you are doing is putting these thoughts together to
achieve that goal. That's all that you are doing. You are thinking.
So, this material has been supplied, to you, by the claimants
who talked about this.
Q: Granted.
UG: You are using that. So, then what is the question?
Q: Then, is the thought condition in which I am itself
satisfactory for life?
UG: It is. It is. It is…
If you don't use that (thought) for any
achievement, spiritual or otherwise, then it is not a burden. Then it becomes
disconnected and disjointed. The demand to continue through the repetition of
the thought is not there.
You have to experience that, again and again and again. Otherwise,
you are not there.
****
No comments:
Post a Comment